how to deploy asset files with ant migration tool

You may use different approaches for different projects, or even blend approaches on a single project. In choosing which option to use for a specific deployment, you’ll need to weigh your objectives, your team’s skills, and limitations in Salesforce. Takeaway #1: The options available to you for deploying changes exist on a spectrum, and each has its own pros, cons, and limitations.If you do decide to skip around, we’ve summarized the key points that you’ll want to take away with you no matter what: You can read this guide straight through, or just jump to the parts that you need. This guide also covers some hurdles you may encounter as you begin using the more complex techniques, deploying changes other than metadata, the various Salesforce environments involved in moving changes to production, an example deployment that combines multiple approaches, and third-party tooling you can use.

Metadata API: Deployment with Source Control + Continuous Integrationįor each option, we discuss the limitations of the approach, why you might choose it, why you might not, and (where appropriate) how to mitigate some of its potential downsides.This decision guide explores seven different deployment options, ranging from simple but not-so-scalable techniques to significantly more complex yet highly scalable approaches: The method you choose for moving a change into production will depend on many factors, including the urgency of the change, its complexity, the size of your team, and the metadata involved. How do you deploy into production? The answer, of course, is “it depends'. It may be something simple, like adding a field or maybe it is much more complex, like a custom application with dozens of objects and thousands of lines of code. Our forward-looking statement applies to roadmap projections. Roadmap corresponds to Spring ‘21 projections.

How to deploy asset files with ant migration tool